Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Curtains Tied Back High Up

dinosaur embryos


in 1976, were found in the arid South African fossils of 10 dinosaur eggs to fry in it. Embryo fossils are the oldest known dinosaur.

Moreover, fossil embryos are the oldest terrestrial vertebrates found so far. A team of paleontologists has their little skeletons studied 30 years later.

embryos are 190 million years. They are the Jurassic period. And they are of a type of dinosaur called masospondilo.

were herbivores and were the forerunners of the majestic and gigantic sauropod (which are similar to the well-known dinos Diplodocus). The masospondilos were a little different to them.

were smaller to begin: adults reached 5 meters in height and had a long neck, but not as long as they are. And the head was very small and cramped. And the biggest difference was their front legs a little shorter than the rear, so walked on two legs or four, as they did.
New techniques, new tracks

Paleontologists have reviewed bones masospondilos embryos are from the University of Toronto, led by Robert Reisz. Reviewed these fossils with a technique that did not exist when they were discovered.

Roughly what they did was lift the shell carefully and look at the embryo or part of them that was hidden under it, because some were with half out. And once they discovered the studied.

fossilized embryos measured 20 centimeters and its level of ossification (ie, the amount of bone that had formed completely in his small skeleton) were to be born.

Small had all four limbs of equal length, indicating that they were quadrupeds at birth and then growing up, did the lower extremities and more faster than the front.

other hand, had a small pelvis indicating that the muscles involved in locomotion were not nearly developed and, therefore, did not walk with ease.

also had no teeth at birth and had a big head (very different than they were also adults who were, as stated above, thin and small).

All this information suggests the paleontologists masospondilo babies require plenty of care of the mother at birth, until the constitution itself acquired by adults.

Source: rtve.es / Image: dinosaur embryo Recreation encontradoSVP

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Revolution Speed Facemasks For Rb

Smith's invisible hand, the contrademocracia and Kelsen's fundamental norm

This thinking stems from the comment made Dueñas Fernando Gaspar week my column "The Counter-tara" warning that Amartya Sen "Smith defends this interpretation (I made mine ) whereby he leaves everything to the market's invisible hand. " The inspirational credit (if any) of this simile belongs to him (Fernando).

"The creditable performance of the Allegedly Capitalist systems in the days when to real Achievements There Were drew on a combination of Institutions That Went Beyond much relying only on a profit-maximising market economy" . Amartya Sen With this statement I am trying to trace the path paved: capitalism we have today works because it is not largely because it is not only market or, even better, because it corrects market failures. So is democracy, for example, to observe in detail the measures that contemporary democracies remain so, we see that almost all are "contrademocráticas", ie, contradict or moderate the majority principle: constitutional limits on the power, fundamental rights, judicial activism, balance of powers, alternation of power, freedom of press, etc..

pseudocapitalismo Just as we have today, with its "visible hand" that contradicts it (the State), suggests our current "contrademocracia (Rosanvallon) or " Democracy has been turned against itself "; Smith's invisible hand suggests the fundamental norm of Kelsen on the mythical dimension that involves any mistake that is at the heart of a great theory. Let's see if I develop the comparison.

Smith says there is an "invisible hand" that regulates the market and it does work well (better known contemporaneously as "market forces"). But, in the words of Amartya Sen, Smith also said that although "capital markets and did a good job within its own sphere ... were not self-sufficient" . So if the market "well" but only "within its own sphere" and not "self" is simply because they do not work well alone, therefore, to be intervene, then the invisible hand, simply does not exist outside the elegant theory: practice is an aporia, as is the "fundamental rule" of Kelsen, which "supposedly" (and attention here to the genuine meaning of the phrase) is on the basis of any legal system and, I add, whether to "assume" is also just does not exist.

Stiglitz said it better than me: "That the reason the invisible hand is invisible Often Seems That It Is Often Not There" . The invisible hand is an unfortunate metaphor, a lie, there, and it does not moral detract Smith (who, as Sen shows, however its unique "invention" was concerned with the aberrations of unbridled capitalism), but it takes strength to his theory of "free" market.

For their part, content to strip the notion of market fair to say that "works well" despite making it conducive to injustice, is a dialectical trap axiologically unsustainable, and that is precisely what liar form radical neoliberal defenders : that the market per se is the panacea for "works well" (and is, in effect, for the handful of men who took over the world).

However, there is great thinkers who lack the intellectual executor (nor of public enemies) and, like Robert Walter did Kelsen (liters of ink to explain why the fundamental rule is not is a priori untenable metaphysical) seems to be doing Amartya Sen Smith (also did Chomsky ): that Smith has written that the market was self-sufficient all it does is to highlight the lack of invisible hand. Kelsen and for having said that justice is a concept that is beyond the positive law and enters the axiological field (politics) only revealed how the natural law is indispensable. In sum, the inherent injustice of the "invisible hand" of Smith not only descriptive but also axiological disputes.

"contradictory and complex? Yes, but Edgar Morin would say that the only way you can hit. Obviously I do not think that neither Kelsen nor Smith have been naive enough to believe the short story "invisible / fundamental." But then, at least historically, appears to be bright to be ambitious enough not to fear mistakes transecular thundered: nobody is exempt from wanting to go down in history, and is becoming the laughing stock (and time reference point) of the intelligentsia of the later generations.

Finally, it is argued that to bring down the system is required Kelsen external criticism. As I gather from the text of Sen's comment in the case of external criticism Smith (your system), he came from unknowingly (or knowingly?). No wonder: it seems to me that Kelsen did the same with the text "What is justice?" In respect of legal positivism. They look too.

end with a quote that I find relevant to evaluative round the idea that reported this point:

"If justice perished, Then it is no Longer Worthwhile for men to live upon the earth ', Kant.

http://relooney .fatcow.com/00_New_2988.pdf





Friday, October 15, 2010

Jak Sciagnac Darmowa Gre Atak Na Berlin

tourism fundamental laws

fundamental laws of tourism: the essential elements of an aesthetic disease [1]

few weeks ago, the tourism I was an abstraction. That is, something that exists even though I knew it seemed, somehow, "normal." (A one in life everything seems normal until you dare to understand.)

Living in a city where the high season does not end, infested throughout the year that hinder tourists not only traffic, but in general the passage of any form of peaceful life, I found the monster in all its concrete and abominable horror.

Gone are the days of splendor in Venice, "La Serenissima", he was. Today, that title can only be the revenge of history on the city's most exquisitely arrogant Europe met XVI.

Taking advantage of my proximity to the dreaded, I set out to discern the essential features of this dreaded social dysfunction that engulfs aesthetic, threatening, remnants of the old culture World (the one that ended in 1965 when global was wrong with the plane tickets).

Inspired by the classic Carlo M. Cipolla ( The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity , 1976) or Theory of Stupidity, as it is known in Italian, I wanted to valid sentences condense the essential features of this dangerous disease . However, the task is complete. Further contributions from epidemiologists most experienced (and masochistic) are called to develop in detail main symptoms and why not, a cure other than genocide. Here we will just state them.

1. Along with Facebook , soap operas, reality shows and Colombian football, tourism is the main form of slavery.
1.2. If given whip, tourists ask for more.

2. cultural voracity of tourists varies in direct proportion to their ignorance.
2.1. Anything worth to be seen with the eyes will inevitably be photographed or filmed. And vice versa.
2.2. Tourism is the antithesis of the perfectibility of man, his ability to educate: the corollary of its irreversible decline as a species.

3. Tourism is also a form of evil.
3.1. categorical imperative: be a good man, unable to do no matter where tourism.

4. All the tourist stepping momentarily loses its meaning mystical, historical and aesthetic.
4.1. From a tourism perspective, any artistic reality becomes pedestrian.

5. The five essential weapons in the tourist approaches the world: the camera, phone, map, speed and jerk face.
picture of two typical Colombian tourists defiling Venice for 4 years (armed to the teeth.)

5.1. The two great enemies of the tourist: the silence and solitude. In addition, any declaration of peace.
5.2. numb the tourist's imagination is unable to travel in time. His past valuation parameters are even more stupid than this.
5.3. Respect for the beauty is impossible. Silent contemplation of any object is not an option. Tourists always have a stupid comment to make. They laugh medieval art for your status atheist; criticize the monarchy based in the Communist Manifesto, Casanova will not forgive him not to use condoms, or the Doges his ridiculous clothes, lack of environmental awareness and the prohibition of abortion and gay marriage.


6. Anything tourists will necessarily eat disgusting.
6.1. No matter what you offer, it will absorb without hesitation, provided that the restaurant is next to a monument and the card is in your language.

7. What has survived tourists survive the end of the world.
7.1. If there Hell is a place in high season all year round.

8. Buy objects of unsurpassed ugliness ( souvenirs) and then display them without restraint in places of privilege. The notion of "investment" as the tourist.

9. The interest of tourists from any place or object is a direct function of the amount of idiots who surround him.
9.1. A building only worth visiting if you have to queue to even get out of it.

10. minimalist definition of a tourist: he said of being inhuman, but that does not walk kicks cities.
10.1. Version française : individu qui est press rien pour voir tout comprendre, qui fait "des villes et des pays au lieu de les découvrir, qui sans jamais phagocytosed taste.
typical picture of Colombian tourists posing as funny in Abu Simbel

[1] Translated from the original Le leggi fondamentali tourism: essenziali elementi di estetica a malattia, the premium Italian opera in volgare (molto volgare) of the undersigned who, after owner text, withdrew to continue in that language out of respect for their intrinsic beauty (the language) .